Why Are Direct To Video Disney Movies So Bad Jtunesmusic Director tad stones at disneytoon studios first pitched the idea of a straight to video sequel for aladdin, which ultimately became aladdin ii: the return of jafar. that movie had a lukewarm critical reception, with criticisms ranging from poor production quality to a painfully obvious lack of robin williams, who declined to return as the genie. He explained that internally at disney, the company's recent pattern of box office failures is being attributed "to a dilution of focus and resources" for movies throughout the pandemic, with the seeming need "to seed disney and hulu with as much content as possible:" "iger has shown confidence in [disney exec alan] bergman, despite the recent.
Which Are Worse Live Action Disney Remakes Vs Direct To Video Disney Though it was more selfish than her mission was but in the end it all worked out for the best because well it’s a disney movie! i thought that disney sequels were the worst thing that the company ever did to make an extra dime off of a film. however, i was wrong because disney released something even more horrible than a sequel; a prequel. It's silly to say that these movies are the worst disney projects ever, or should never be considered canon, or that they cheapened the disney name. yes, a lot of the sequels were cash grabs, but there were also a lot that were actually trying. Not all disney sequels are bad. lion king 2 is decent (vastly inferior to the original but still okay) and so is king of thieves. it is those sequels made in the 2000s that really suck, where it's clear that they didn't put any effort into it whatsoever. fox and the hound 2 and jungle book 2 are especially bad examples. The film's success opened a new home video market for disney. even after the story of "the return of jafar" had ballooned beyond the length of a half hour tv pilot, it was still intended to run on.
Negative Impacts Of Disney Films Best Movies Right Now Not all disney sequels are bad. lion king 2 is decent (vastly inferior to the original but still okay) and so is king of thieves. it is those sequels made in the 2000s that really suck, where it's clear that they didn't put any effort into it whatsoever. fox and the hound 2 and jungle book 2 are especially bad examples. The film's success opened a new home video market for disney. even after the story of "the return of jafar" had ballooned beyond the length of a half hour tv pilot, it was still intended to run on. With the arrival of pixar and its animated films, disney began to change its mind about sequels and their releases. the studio originally intended for toy story 2 to be a straight to video sequel, but the story reels were quite promising and was upgraded to a theatrical release. even though toy story 2 was a big success, disney needed more. Here are all the disney classic's direct to video sequels, prequels, and midquels ranked from best to worst (or better put, from pretty bad to very bad). advertisement 1.
Comments are closed.