Robotic Resection Superior To Laparoscopy For Middle And Low Rectal

Robotic Resection Superior To Laparoscopy For Middle And Low Rectal Robotic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer by experienced surgeons could improve surgical quality compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. fewer patients in the robotic surgical group experienced 1 or more postoperative complications within 30 days of operation compared with those in the laparoscopic surgical group (16.2% vs 23.1%. However, although the study parameters were strictly controlled, decisions regarding abdominoperineal resection, stoma creation, and conversion were at the discretion of the surgeon, and these outcomes differed between the two groups. 565 (48%) of 1171 patients in the study had low rectal cancers in an anatomical region that is particularly.

Robotic Colon Resection Dallas Tx Bowel Obstruction Dallas Tx Laparoscopic surgery is a widely recognised treatment for colon cancer. however, its use for rectal cancer is controversial. previous trials have shown that, although long term oncological outcomes were similar, 1–3 laparoscopic surgery did not achieve non inferiority of pathological tumour radicality compared with open surgery, 4,5 and could lead to more incomplete mesorectal excision. 6. Patients with middle (> 5–10 cm from anal verge) or low (0–5 cm from anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma, ct1–t3 n0–1 or yct1–t3 nx after preoperative radio chemoradiotherapy, and no evidence of distant metastasis were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive robotic or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Feng q, yuan w, li t, et al. robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (real): short term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. lancet gastroenterol hepatol. Six patients in the robotic surgery group received laparoscopic surgery and seven patients in the laparoscopic surgery group received robotic surgery. 22 (4·0%) of 547 patients in the robotic group had a positive circumferential resection margin as did 39 (7·2%) of 543 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference 3·2 percentage points [95.

Robotic Rectal Surgery Cutting Edge Surgical Associates Feng q, yuan w, li t, et al. robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (real): short term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. lancet gastroenterol hepatol. Six patients in the robotic surgery group received laparoscopic surgery and seven patients in the laparoscopic surgery group received robotic surgery. 22 (4·0%) of 547 patients in the robotic group had a positive circumferential resection margin as did 39 (7·2%) of 543 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference 3·2 percentage points [95. This is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel group, superiority trial comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopic surgery for radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. a total of 11 centres in eight provinces of china participated in this trial (appendix p 4). Intersphincteric resection following robotic assisted versus laparoscopy assisted total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer: a multicentre propensity score analysis of 1571 patients yuchen guo , md, a liang he , md, a weidong tong , md, b shuangyi ren , md, c zhaocheng chi , md, d ke tan , md, b bo wang , md, c chunxiao lie.