Multiple Comparison Study The Mona Lisa Foundation Critical comparisons. multiple comparison study. as mentioned, there are literally dozens of copies and variations of the mona lisa; some good, and some less so. it is simply neither practical nor possible to analyse each one in this publication, and make a fair comparison with either of the originals. some worth mentioning include copies in. Size. perhaps the most obvious difference is in the sizes. the ‘ earlier mona lisa ’ is quite a bit larger: the width is c.64.5cm, and the height is c.86cm. the wood panel of the louvre ‘ mona lisa ’ is slightly uneven: according to the louvre’s own measurements, the width varies between 53.3cm at the top, and 53.4cm at the bottom.
Multiple Comparison Study The Mona Lisa Foundation Critical comparisons. summary of critical comparisons. this section highlights similarities and the differences between the earlier and louvre versions of mona lisa. paintings, and some of the copies that emanated from them: • clear similarities between the mona lisas are: the pose; the veil; the profiles; the hands; the clothing; the loggia. But the mona lisa foundation said it spent 35 years verifying all the historic, scientific and forensic evidence, and has concluded that da vinci did indeed paint the islesworth mona lisa. but while it maintains the work’s authenticity, it acknowledges two key issues: for some reason the master didn’t finish the isleworth painting — nor. The multiple ‘mona lisa’ problem. they say the eyes of the mona lisa follow you around a room. the demure smile of leonardo da vinci ‘s finest creation has been subject to public fascination for centuries. trailing behind the actual, all seeing painting are various copies, which pop up so often that it casts doubt on the legitimacy of the. However, the reynolds “mona lisa”, though well executed, is unable to recreate the infinitely subtle shades of light and shadow, especially in the modelling of the face and hands [6]; • the mona lisa foundation as well as many experts are inclined towards confirming the isleworth “mona lisa” as authentic and probably executed before.
Multiple Comparison Study The Mona Lisa Foundation The multiple ‘mona lisa’ problem. they say the eyes of the mona lisa follow you around a room. the demure smile of leonardo da vinci ‘s finest creation has been subject to public fascination for centuries. trailing behind the actual, all seeing painting are various copies, which pop up so often that it casts doubt on the legitimacy of the. However, the reynolds “mona lisa”, though well executed, is unable to recreate the infinitely subtle shades of light and shadow, especially in the modelling of the face and hands [6]; • the mona lisa foundation as well as many experts are inclined towards confirming the isleworth “mona lisa” as authentic and probably executed before. In a museum in st. petersburg (figure 1), is a copy of the “ mona lisa ” by leonardo. (figure 2) dating to a period between 1590 and 1660. noteworthy features include the. good quality. The following is a list of works by da vinci, for which there are known to have been multiple versions: madonna and child. one, the ‘ dreyfus madonna ’, is currently in the national gallery of art, washington, d.c. and a second hangs in the monastery of camaldoli in tuscany. there are several others believed to be collaborative works with.
Multiple Comparison Study The Mona Lisa Foundation In a museum in st. petersburg (figure 1), is a copy of the “ mona lisa ” by leonardo. (figure 2) dating to a period between 1590 and 1660. noteworthy features include the. good quality. The following is a list of works by da vinci, for which there are known to have been multiple versions: madonna and child. one, the ‘ dreyfus madonna ’, is currently in the national gallery of art, washington, d.c. and a second hangs in the monastery of camaldoli in tuscany. there are several others believed to be collaborative works with.
Comments are closed.