A Hopeless Bible Contradiction Why Do Matthew And Luke Give Us Two One of the charges of contradiction brought by skeptics against the bible is the surface appearance of contradiction between matthew’s genealogical list (1:1 17) and the one provided by luke (3:23 38). as is always the case, the charge of contradiction is premature and reflects an immature appraisal of the extant evidence. Answer. jesus’ genealogy is given in two places in scripture: matthew 1 and luke 3:23 38. matthew traces the genealogy from jesus to abraham. luke traces the genealogy from jesus to adam. however, there is good reason to believe that matthew and luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies. for example, matthew gives joseph’s.
Contradiction 5 Genealogies From Matthew And Luke Youtube 1. one of the genealogies is actually mary's. the simplest solution is that we have genealogies of both parents of jesus—joseph and mary. in this case, luke gives us mary’s genealogy, while matthew gives us joseph’s genealogy. this makes good sense, since luke’s birth narrative focuses on mary. luke tells the story from her perspective. Matthew places his genealogy at the beginning (matt. 1), while luke places it after jesus’ baptism (luke 3). matthew organizes the names in a 14 14 14 scheme (matt. 1:17), while luke may be adopting a subtle 11x7 scheme. these choices are not contradictions. they simply reflect how the two evangelists have different goals. When god inspired them, he knew what he was doing. studying the gospels, we immediately encounter the problem of major differences between the genealogies of jesus in matthew and luke. matthew 1. Among the many contradictions between the two birth narratives, the genealogies presented by matthew and luke are impossible to resolve. matthew places jesus in the 26th generation after david, while luke places him in the 41st generation. granted that one genealogy leads to joseph and the other leads to mary, 15 generations is a very big gap!.
Understanding The Genealogy In Matthew 1 2 16 And Luke 3 23 34 A When god inspired them, he knew what he was doing. studying the gospels, we immediately encounter the problem of major differences between the genealogies of jesus in matthew and luke. matthew 1. Among the many contradictions between the two birth narratives, the genealogies presented by matthew and luke are impossible to resolve. matthew places jesus in the 26th generation after david, while luke places him in the 41st generation. granted that one genealogy leads to joseph and the other leads to mary, 15 generations is a very big gap!. Dec 16, 2022. by hank hanegraaff. at first blush the genealogies of matthew and luke appear to be contradictory. in reality, the genealogies are ingeniously constructed to highlight different aspects of the person and work of jesus christ. matthew, writing to a primarily jewish audience, emphasized that jesus christ is the seed of abraham and. A contradiction? anyone who studies the genealogies will immediately notice that the genealogies are stated to be of joseph, not jesus.matthew 1:16 reads, “and jacob the father of joseph the husband of mary, of whom jesus was born, who is called christ,” while luke 3:23 reads, “jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of joseph.
Do Matthew And Luke S Genealogies Contradict Youtube Dec 16, 2022. by hank hanegraaff. at first blush the genealogies of matthew and luke appear to be contradictory. in reality, the genealogies are ingeniously constructed to highlight different aspects of the person and work of jesus christ. matthew, writing to a primarily jewish audience, emphasized that jesus christ is the seed of abraham and. A contradiction? anyone who studies the genealogies will immediately notice that the genealogies are stated to be of joseph, not jesus.matthew 1:16 reads, “and jacob the father of joseph the husband of mary, of whom jesus was born, who is called christ,” while luke 3:23 reads, “jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of joseph.
Comments are closed.